{"id":3803,"date":"2018-09-03T12:49:47","date_gmt":"2018-09-03T11:49:47","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.freud.org.uk\/?p=3803"},"modified":"2019-10-23T16:55:14","modified_gmt":"2019-10-23T15:55:14","slug":"the-fragile-phallus-conference","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.freud.org.uk\/2018\/09\/03\/the-fragile-phallus-conference\/","title":{"rendered":"Conference Podcast: The Fragile Phallus"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"A<\/h2>\n

The latest string of sexual assault and harassment scandals invites critical reflection into the structure of masculinity.<\/h2>\n

While much of the media focus has been on abuses of power, popular responses such as the #MeToo movement have emphasised the everydayness of sexual harassment, shifting the focus to masculinity as such.<\/p>\n

Psychoanalysis has long held that masculinity is not a biological given, nor is it simply the sum total of patriarchal values operating on an individual. Rather, it is characterised by a peculiar, fraught and anxious relation to the psychical emblem of the \u2018phallus\u2019.<\/p>\n

How might psychoanalysis enrich popular notions of \u2018fragile\u2019 and \u2018toxic\u2019 masculinity?<\/p>\n

This conference brings together perspectives from psychoanalysis and beyond to bring out some of these troubling (and troubled) dimensions of the subjective structure popularly known as \u2018masculinity\u2019.<\/p>\n

Introduction
\nStefan Marianski<\/h3>\n