{"id":8438,"global_id":"www.freud.org.uk?id=8438","global_id_lineage":["www.freud.org.uk?id=8438"],"author":"2","status":"publish","date":"2020-09-26 14:13:43","date_utc":"2020-09-26 13:13:43","modified":"2020-10-31 14:21:23","modified_utc":"2020-10-31 13:21:23","url":"https:\/\/www.freud.org.uk\/event\/psychoanalysis-post-truth-us-election-special\/","rest_url":"https:\/\/www.freud.org.uk\/wp-json\/tribe\/events\/v1\/events\/8438","title":"Psychoanalysis “Post-truth”: US Election Special","description":"
Sundays 1 and 8 November, 14:00 – 17.30 GMT<\/strong><\/p>\n If so, how can psychoanalysis and other fields of thought help us illuminate the contours of this predicament?<\/p>\n Misinformation, misinterpretation and outright lies have been part of public discourse since the ancient world. However, what strikes us today is the imperviousness of falsehoods to correction through the presentation of facts. This phenomenon first caught public attention following the Brexit vote and election of Donald Trump \u2013 and in the past months, has massively intensified in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic.<\/p>\n The poorly-defined term \u2018post-truth\u2019 indexes a series of contemporary political and psychic phenomena, including the collapse of traditional media and rise of social media; the ascendancy of extreme rightwing politicians; and the mainstreaming of conspiracy theories including ‘anti-vaxxers’, ‘COVID-truthers’, and ‘Q-Anon’.<\/p>\n Moreover, contemporary political antagonisms in the field of gender (from #MeToo to men\u2019s rights, and from non-binary to trans exclusionary feminism) and race (from BLM to the so-called refugee crisis) have put the question of social justice face to face with problems of libidinal enjoyment, identification, and the manipulability of meaning.<\/p>\n On the cusp of the US presidential election and deepening political uncertainty around the world, this interdisciplinary digital conference brings critical and psychoanalytic interventions to bear on the question of politics and public discourse in the midst of the apparent collapse of trust in scientific and authoritative knowledge.<\/p>\n This conference is organised\u00a0with Dr\u00a0Jordan Osserman<\/strong>,\u00a0Dr\u00a0Foivos Dousos<\/strong>\u00a0and Dr Fil Ieropoulos<\/strong> in partnership with the Ministry of Post-Truth<\/a> and Waiting Times<\/a>.<\/p>\n Audience participation is highly encouraged and the event has been designed to maximise engagement across speakers and attendees.<\/p>\n 14:00 – 15:30 GMT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Jordan Osserman & Foivos Dousos<\/strong> Todd McGowan Aimee Le 15:30 – 16:00 GMT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Break \/ Artists’ videos showcase<\/p>\n 16:00 – 17:30 GMT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Jamieson Webster Michael Bronski Carlton Jama Adams<\/strong> 14:00 – 15:30 GMT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Yannis Stavrakakis Jaice Sara Titus Brian Friedberg 15:30 – 16:00 GMT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Break \/ Artists’ video showcase<\/p>\n 16:00 – 17:30 GMT<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Renata Salecl<\/strong> Richard Seymour Michael Flexer<\/strong> Artists’ video Showcase & Audio play<\/p>\n Video works by:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Audio-play by:<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n Todd McGowan Aim\u00e9e L\u00ea<\/strong> Jamieson Webster Michael Flexer<\/strong> Carlton Jama Adams<\/strong> Yannis Stavrakakis Jaice Sara Titus Michael Bronski Richard Seymour Renata Salecl<\/strong> Brian Friedberg Dr Aim\u00e9e L\u00ea<\/strong> is a Vietnamese American poet and critic. She is an Associate Lecturer in Creative Writing at University of Exeter and an Associate Member of the Royal Holloway Poetics Research Centre.<\/span><\/p>\n Jamieson Webster<\/strong> is a psychoanalyst based in New York. She teaches at Princeton\u00a0University and supervises\u00a0graduate students at the City University of New York; Dr. Webster is a graduate of the\u00a0Institute for\u00a0Psychoanalytic Training and Research and a founding member of\u00a0Das Unbehagen<\/em>, a collective that explores psychoanalysis outside of an institutional framework. She has written for\u00a0Artforum<\/em>,\u00a0Apology<\/em>,The Guardian<\/em>,\u00a0PlayGirl<\/em>,\u00a0The New York Review of Books\u00a0<\/em>and\u00a0The New York Times<\/em>. She is the author of\u00a0Conversion Disorder: Listening to the Body in Psychoanalysis<\/em>\u00a0(Columbia University Press, 2018);\u00a0Stay, Illusion!: The Hamlet Doctrine<\/em>, with Simon Critchley (Pantheon, 2013); and\u00a0The Life and Death of Psychoanalysis<\/em>\u00a0(Karnac, 2011). With Marcus Coelen, she is currently working on a book about\u00a0Jacques Lacan.\u00a0<\/em><\/span><\/p>\n Dr Michael J Flexer<\/strong> works at University of Exeter as the publicly engaged research fellow for the Wellcome-funded Waiting Times project. He previously taught medical semiotics and humanities at Imperial College, London and semio-linguistics and psycholinguistics at Sheffield Hallam University, and held a post-doc in medical humanities at King\u2019s College, London. His PhD at University of Leeds was in medical, linguistic, pathographic and pop cultural representations of psychosis and was cross-supervised by Professor Stuart Murray in the School of English and Professor Allan House, a psychiatrist in the Institute of Health Sciences.\u00a0Prior to academia, he ran a small political theatre company and worked as a semiotician.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Michael Bronski<\/strong> is an independent scholar, journalist, and writer who has been involved in social justice movements since the 1960s. He has been active in gay liberation as a political organizer, writer, editor, publisher and theorist since 1969. He is the author of numerous award wining books including The Pleasure Principle: Sex, Backlash and the Struggle for Gay Freedom<\/em> (1998) and Considering Hate: Violence, Goodness, and Justice in American Culture and Politics<\/em> (2015). His most recent is A Queer History of the United States for Young People<\/em> (2019). He is\u00a0Professor of the Practice in Activism and Media in the Studies of Women, Gender and Sexuality at Harvard University.<\/p>\n Richard Seymour<\/strong> is a London-based writer and editor. He is the author of The Twittering Machine<\/em> (Indigo Press, 2019), and a founding editor of Salvage magazine.<\/p>\n Renata Salecl<\/strong> is a philosopher, sociologist and legal theorist. She is Professor at the School of Law, Birkbeck College, University of London and senior researcher at the Institute of Criminology at Faculty of Law in Ljubljana, Slovenia. Her book Tyranny of Choice<\/em> has been published in 15 languages. Her last book is A Passion for Ignorance: What We Choose Not to Know and Why<\/em> (Princeton University Press, 2020).<\/p>\n Brian Friedberg<\/strong> is the Senior Researcher of the Technology and Social Change Research Project at the Shorenstein Center on Media, Politics and Public Policy at Harvard Kennedy School. Merging academic methods and Open Source Intelligence techniques, Brian is an investigative ethnographer, focusing on the impacts alternative media, anonymous communities and unpopular cultures have on political communication and organization.\u00a0 Brian holds an MA in Cultural Production from Brandeis University.<\/span><\/p>\n C. Jama Adams, PhD<\/strong>, is a clinical psychologist, academic and Evertonian!. He is a child of empire who was born in Liverpool of Jamaican and Somali parents. He grew up in Liverpool, Guyana and Jamaica and has resided in New York for most of his adult life. Dr. Adams is Associate Professor of Psychology in the Department of Africana Studies at John Jay College of Criminal Justice-City University of New York. He has published on psychological aspects of immigration, including a book on Africana workers in China. He has also published on Africana fatherhood and Africana identity issues.<\/p>\n Oisin Byrne and Gary Farrelly Contrapoints (Natalie Wynn)<\/strong>Are we truly living in a post-truth era?<\/h2>\n
Programme<\/h2>\n
Sunday 1 November<\/h3>\n
\nIntroduction<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>The Truth of Desire in a Post-Truth World<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>The Social Hole: Fantasies of Social Partnership and Aporias of Bourgeois Thought<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Hysteria and #MeToo<\/span><\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>It’s My Party and I’ll Die If I Want to: The Carnivalesque and the Inevitability of the Anti-Mask Movement<\/em><\/p>\n
\n\u201cThis ain\u2019t that\u201d: Black truths and White (dis)comfort<\/em><\/p>\nSunday 8 November<\/h3>\n
\n<\/strong>Truth or Trust?<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Can’t say anything anymore?: Comedy, Alt-Right and Freedom<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>We Are The News Now: Distrust and Distributed Amplification in the Qanon Movement<\/em><\/p>\n
\nDenial and Ignorance in Times of Covid-19<\/em><\/p>\n
\n<\/strong> <\/b>\u201cMolecules of fascism\u201d: the \u2018Red Pill\u2019 as Antidepressant.<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe Frog is a Slur: Trolling Truth and the Semiotics of Dog-whistling<\/em><\/p>\n1 – 8 November<\/h3>\n
\n
\n
Abstracts<\/h2>\n
\n<\/strong>The Truth of Desire in a Post-Truth World
\n<\/em>The widespread acceptance that there are no longer shared facts has forced psychoanalytic interpretation on everyone. As a result, people are forced to become increasingly adept at interpreting the truth of desire in order to make sense of what facts are valid and what facts are not. This fosters the possibility of a collective recognition of the role of the unconscious in establishing truth.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n
\nThe Social Hole: Fantasies of Social Partnership and Aporias of Bourgeois Thought<\/span>
\n<\/em>Drawing on Luk\u00e1cs and Lacan, I will discuss fantasies of social partnership as found in policy proposals aiming to rehabilitate the contemporary public sphere. These centrist proposals, while aiming to represent a \u2018reasonable\u2019 compromise between antagonistic interests, neglect a crucial vantage point: that of the economic system itself. I will discuss alternate possibilities through representations of totality through poetry, counterposing examples of fascist writing and Brecht\u2019s political poems.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Hysteria and #MeToo<\/em>
\nIn one of Freud\u2019s last papers, \u201cConstructions in Analysis,\u201d he announces a new idea of truth, one that nearly collapses the distinction between psychosis and hysteria. With Freud in tow, I aim to consider whether we are more psychotic or hysterical in our post-truth world.<\/p>\n
\nThe Frog is a Slur: Trolling Truth and the Semiotics of Dog-whistling
\n<\/em>\u2018Western\u2019 culture is awash with troubling coded signs, redolent of fascism. To the un(der)initiated in the shibboleth, they prompt paranoia-infused thoughts: something is being said, but what? A humanised frog from an obscure comic book, the Fred Perry polo shirt and even the \u2018ok\u2019 hand gesture have all been co-opted and weaponized as far-right signs. We sense this to be the case, but we cannot articulate the message precisely. Despite the high visibility of the signifier, the signified is clouded in ambiguity.\u00a0How does this idiolect of hate construct itself through irony, insinuation and bad faith manoeuvres of meta-reflexivity \u2013 such as plausible deniability, hiding in plain sight and trollish dishonest appeals to humour? Reading these signs can bring their penumbral signifieds \u2013 and their self-described \u2018dark\u2019 participatory communities constitutive of their meanings \u2013 out into the light, so that their arguments can unambiguously be seen and understood for what they are, and can be critically (as well as morally and politically) dismantled. This deliberate deployment of an exclusionary dog-whistle dialect is coupled to palpably disingenuous arguments for free speech, so we will interrogate what free speech means (and can be preserved as meaning) when cynically bound to a fascist, secret language steeped in irony. The analysis and argument throughout will be unashamedly and unapologetically anti-fascist. This weasely cant, and the so-called \u2018edge lords\u2019 who speak it, should be resisted at every moment and in every way.<\/p>\n
\n\u201cThis ain\u2019t that\u201d: Black truths and White (dis)comfort
\n<\/em>Being Black comes to the individual unbidden and open to infinite interpretations A weak commonality to these differing constructions, is the necessity to struggle against attempts to marginalize Black subjectivities. Black truth-speaking is often devalued as it is a challenge to the disingenuous construction of truth that is necessary to maintain white comfort. One way of thinking of \u2018post-truth\u2019, is as providing an opening for ethically grounded truths, around which to construct nurturing and protective paradigms in the service of living good-enough lives. In that sense ethically and historically informed Black truths are an invaluable contribution.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Truth or Trust?
\n<\/em>The limited value of truth from a psychoanalytic perspective and the importance of other dimensions.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>Can’t say anything anymore?: Comedy, Alt-Right and Freedom
\n<\/em>If we take the notion of post-truth to be a liberal response to a resurgent populism, and to the idea that the populist will say anything and not care about the truth, then the response of the alt-right seems to be the opposite of this, which is to say, that you cannot say anything these days, particularly the truth, because of liberal political correctness.\u00a0In this paper I will explore the bounded nature of contemporary politics and comedy through a psychoanalytic lens. Through a discussion of freedom and determinism pertaining to the unconscious, I will interrogate the concept of truth and establish how as Lacan suggests, \u201cSaying it all is literally impossible [because] words fail\u201d.<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>It’s My Party and I’ll Die If I Want to: The Carnivalesque and the Inevitability of the Anti-Mask Movement<\/em>
\nThe contemporary, growing. anti-mask movement in the United States has been reviled as dangerous and irrational. While it is certainly the former it is not irrational; its internal logic carefully predicated on countering accepted science and sense. These beliefs and behaviors may be best understood examined through the lens of, and in the context of, long standing traditions of the carnivalesque, misrule, and the biblical image of the \u201cworld turned upside down,\u201d phenomenon often described in terms of, or located close, to Freud\u2019s notion of the uncanny. What is behind the desire, experienced and enacted on a mass level, to turn considered judgments of science \u201cupside down\u201d even when the results may be fatal?<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>\u201cMolecules of fascism\u201d: the \u2018Red Pill\u2019 as Antidepressant.
\n<\/em>The social industry and the far right today comprise a resonance machine.\u00a0Fascist YouTube makes twice as much money from the superchat function as equivalent forces on the Left. Stefan Molyneux, Alex Jones, Gavin McInnes, Richard Spencer and Tommy Robinson have made small fortunes from their contribution to fascist renewal. Donald Trump, at his zenith, was worth $2bn to Twitter: a fifth of the value.\u00a0We blame the algorithms for\u00a0\u2018radicalising\u2019 the users. But what, we might reasonably wonder, is so addictive about a three-hour long Prison Planet rant about \u2018libtards\u2019? What is so thrilling about \u2018extreme\u2019 content (cf,\u00a0\u2018extreme\u2019 sport)? And why does fascist infotainment so efficiently turn depressed men into ‘lone wolf’ vigilantes?<\/p>\n
\nDenial and Ignorance in times of Covid-19
\n<\/em>Abstract TBC<\/p>\n
\n<\/strong>We Are The News Now: Distrust and Distributed Amplification in the Qanon Movement
\n<\/em>Since it\u2019s start in October 2017, the Qanon Movement has been a major amplifier of rumors, disinformation and conspiracy theories. Positioning themselves directly in opposition to so-called mainstream media, Qanon adherents fundamentally distrust the news, share both verified and unverified information, and interpret critical press as vindication. Through a critical examination of \u201cWe Are The News Now,\u201d a viral Qanon slogan, we illustrate how the movement has used social media to iterate and evangelize, and identify the technique of \u201cdistributed amplification\u201d in the spread of disinformation online.
\n<\/em><\/p>\nSpeakers’ Biographies<\/h2>\n
Artworks<\/h2>\n
\n<\/strong>The Biscuit Tin<\/em>
\nIn \u201cThe Biscuit Tin\u201d, the deeply confessional story of an innocent childhood misconception is performed by Gary Farrelly to Oisin Byrne\u2019s interrogative camera. The monologue deviates from \u2018objective truth\u2019 opening up space for a reflection on free will and its relation to enjoyment. Are the rules on how to enjoy things universal? Who makes these rules? What type of enjoyment does the transgression of narrative rules produce?<\/p>\n
\nIncels<\/em>
\nIn her most popular video, youtuber and political theorist Natalie Wynn presents a deep dive into the world of Incels. Incels, a portmanteau of \u2018involuntary celibates\u2019, are members of an online subculture infamous for its extreme misogyny, self-harming tendencies and adherence to conspiracies of a supposed anti-male existing propaganda of the left. In an attempt to truly understand this complex phenomenon, Wynn goes much further than describing the communities\u2019 characteristics and dismissing them from the start; she engages seriously with their talking points, psychic realities and aesthetics. A true youtube masterpiece.<\/p>\n