Why did Pankejeff suddenly become so bad-tempered?
This is the first mystery of the case.
Up until he was 3½ he was quiet and good-tempered, but then he suddenly became irritable and naughty.
As Pankejeff’s analysis with Freud unfolded, it became clear that this change coincided with a troubling scene.
His sister had touched him sexually, and shortly afterwards he tried to touch himself in front of his nanny. She told him off, declaring that little children who did that got a ‘wound’ in that place.
Freud’s interpretation is based on a series of oppositions between activity and passivity.
“It looks as though his seduction by his sister had forced him into a passive role, and had given him a passive sexual aim.”Sigmund Freud
A key claim of psychoanalysis is that sexuality is not just one thing, but is a kind of mosaic made up of different drives of the body (such as the oral, anal or genital drives).
These drives can be either passive or active. For example, the oral drive can be linked to eating (active) or being eaten (passive).
Pankejeff’s sister’s advances had activated his phallic drive. It also put him into a passive position: she is doing something to him. This is what he re-enacted in relation to his nanny, who blocked his advances with a threat.
Events such as weaning, potty training, or traumatic experiences can shift the child’s interests and anxieties from one drive to another.
With the genital drive inhibited by this threat, Pankejeff’s sexual preoccupations shifted from the genital drive to the anal drive, where the main active trend is sadism and the passive trend is masochism.
Freud’s argument is that Pankejeff’s temper tantrums were in fact attempts to make his father punish him.
“Under the persisting influence of this experience he pursued a path from his sister via his nanny to his father.”Sigmund Freud
This may seem like an absurd explanation, but Freud bases it on a meticulous attention to the details of Pankejeff’s childhood. The case material is overflowing with themes of passivity and masochism, and a thinly-veiled preoccupation with wounds to the body.
It is also worth noting that Freud’s argument is a more detailed version of one that few people would disagree with: childhood experiences of sexual assault or abuse can have serious consequences for psychological development.
Why did Pankejeff’s naughtiness suddenly end?
The second transformation of the case is even more beguiling than the first. Pankejeff’s naughtiness ended practically overnight and was replaced by a period of intense anxiety.
But this time, the transformation wasn’t linked to a traumatic experience but to a terrifying dream.