|
Exhibition at the Freud Museum Jan 10 – March 11, 2007 Open 12 - 5 pm, Wednesday to Sunday: entry to Museum & Exhibition £5 (£3 concessions). (also at Swiss Cottage Library NW3 and the The Arts Club W1) …the proximity of art and life against the backdrop
of contemporary politics exploring issues of distrust, suspicion, delusion,
fear and terror.
Fictional apocalyptic stories are worryingly similar to everyday reality, causing increasing fear and creating a climate of anxiety. When does the mind become paranoid? Paranoia is the terrifying fear of being hurt.
Presenting works of international artists exploring the essence of paranoia as one's deluded interpretation of events, not the perception of the events themselves. Artists exhibiting in PARANOIA are from diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds, many from the world’s areas of conflict. The exhibition incorporates digital technology, conceptual work, performance, photography, video, installation and drawing. Oreet Ashery, Mireille Astore, Franko B, Maja Bajevic, Daniel Baker, Rana Bishara, Lisa K Blatt, Tim Blake, laurie halsey brown, Mircea Cantor, Norman Cowie, Jeremy Deller, Martin Effert, Amy Feigley, Doug Fishbone, Juan del Gado, Catherine Graham, Sagi Groner, Hatice Guleryuz, Juul Hondius, Helmut Loehr, Avi Mograbi, Ricardo Giraldo Montes, Vesna Milicevic, Hillary Mushkin, Diane Nerwen, Jean-Gabriel Periot, Khaled D. Ramadan, Karst-Janneke Rogaar, Paul Ryan, Jackie Salloum, Larissa Sansour, Nike Savvas, Santiago Sierra, Tatjana Strugar, Doron Solomons, Emilia Telese, Milica Tomic, Akram Zaatari, Katarina Zdjelar, Rachel Wilberforce, Roel Wouters. A full colour catalogue accompanies the exhibition, with essays by Glenn Bowman, Dr Bernadette Buckley, Dr Elizabeth Cowie, Michael Hodges, Jane Hunter-Yetton, Antonio Pasolini, Khaled D. Ramadan, Christel Vesters, introduction by Predrag Pajdic and interviews with selected artists. Available from the Freud Museum shop. For further information: www.aionarap.org Excerpts from Artists’ Interviews and Essays in the ‘Paranoia’ Catalogue Instead of limiting ourselves, and staying stuck in our private realms, we must face up to the challenges present in today’s society. We must contemplate our fears and carefully examine our attitudes. We must speak out. (From ‘Stuck in the Middle’ by Christel Vesters) Gypsies are still very much seen as unreal people.
They are seen either as a romantic ideal from the past or as the thief,
the villain, the dirty people that will pull their trailer onto your cricket
ground and make a mess, a personification of evil if you like.
Paranoia names two kinds of not-knowing. In psychosis
it is a kind of not-knowing through the creation of a belief system that
responds to the foreclosed. It is what returns from without the subject,
in contrast to neurotic repression, which returns as an irruption in the
subject as symptoms, slips of the tongue, jokes etc. In anxiety, paranoia
is another kind of not-knowing in being experienced as a dreadful anticipation.
Anxiety is different from fear because it exceeds the response proper to
the circumstance, or because it is experienced even where there is no ostensible
cause for fear or its anticipation.
Haneke's study of paranoia shares with those of
Freud and Lacan an attention to the structures of verwerfung or forclusion.
Laurent, like the bourgeois French society he so convincingly exemplifies,
has buried beneath the comfortable and confident life he shares with friends
and family a brutal injustice.
As the world looks today, I can confidently say
that I am an unidentified subject. That is the way it is, if you are an
Arab living in the West, in a time where words have lost their meanings
and significance, in a time where human rights means torture and egalitarianism
means authoritarianism.
I think that there is no difference between artists
and the “others”: Responsibility concerns everybody. We are all responsible.
In certain historical and political moments of great importance, engagement
expressed in either grand political statements or in personal narratives
and comments, are merged. There is no difference.
I used some most disturbing material imaginable,
which curls even my toes when I watch it, I can’t believe I did that. My
idea was to offend the audience and manipulate the viewer by giving them
a sub-story and winning them back. Something like: I was abused when I
was a kid, my mum was a drunk, all these things. I wanted to see how much
one could get away with using a visual overload. There are about 480 images
squeezed in 11 minutes. It is a kind of video barrage, like being bombarded
with adds while on tube escalators, which I can’t stand. This is why I
use a satire way of critique while narrating but in a way that is hardly
noticeable.
As he moves around the house he is silent in his
slippers, creeping Jesus we used to laugh about his silence, now we don’t
laugh. We haven’t laughed for years and years and years. Look at him sitting
there now; he doesn’t take bites out of his food any more he just nibbles.
Takes little ibitty bitty nibbles and it makes me want to scream and shout
TAKE A PROPER FUCKING BITE WHY DON’T YOU?
I think that inasmuch as 9/11 was an affront to
Americans personally as individuals and to their country it was almost
that they were embarrassed to be caught out like that. This is a way for
them to feel better about being themselves in that country. It’s a real
celebration about America and American values. When you look at the photographs,
that comes out. You can either interpret it as being incredibly sinister,
or quite funny, or both. When I show the photographs to Americans they
laugh, but when I showed them in France the French gasp.
What struck me most during my travels is that,
at the end of the day what unites people, no matter where they come from,
is the struggle to survive and to try to make the best of it along the
way.
The Arab media learned from the western media
that democracy is not that essential in contemporary broadcasting. Not
in terms of war, nor in terms of peace. What matters is how to serve and
mobilize your community against outside messages.
Whenever you read Lonely Planet or any other travel
guides in relation to India, they mention that you can take your favourite
garment to an Indian tailor and they will replicate it. This notion off
course only makes sense because of the cheap labour in India in relation
to western money exchange.
In light of such contradictions, perhaps it is
useless to attempt to give to paranoia a social and/or political determination?
For the moment, let’s return to psychiatry where we’re sure to get an unambiguous
definition of the term. But no, here also, divergences persist across the
different schools and individuals attempting to characterize paranoia.
It becomes a habit, so if you are used to having
a daily cycle where you are terrified or worried by the things around you,
and then seek out the details about it, you will begin to look forward
to your little bit of terror every day. It’s a habit.
What particularly interests me is actually what
isn’t said. What my friends don’t talk about. For example how it is to
be living in a reality where bombs go off just outside your door, or whether
what happened is wrong or not. They don’t discuss feelings or politics.
Instead they talk about the technical details, the mindset of the suicide
bomber before he goes in, the special unit whose only job it is to collect
body parts so that the victims can be identified. I am fascinated by what
brings on this psychological buffer.
My hope is that different realities, or sides
of a story, can be displayed side-by-side, so that viewers can, without
any pre-conception or judgement, think for themselves. With respect to
these vital issues today how long until we seek out methods for this dialogue,
and to adopt a question by Primo Levi, ‘If Not Now When?’
|